Sunday, July 14, 2013

GATA's Bill Murphy on the Manipulated Gold Drop

From theprimeinterest

This Week in Money

From MoneyandWealth

Published on Jul 13, 2013
Ross Clark - Bonds, stocks, metals: what's new? Sean Brodrick - Palladium update. Produced by

New study: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile


Article link

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Read more

Still my favourite short video on 9/11. From corbettreport

Good to see Dmitri is back in fine form

From FPSRussia

Screen Grab of the Week

For the story behind this Fuk up go here

SD Metals and Markets With Chris Duane

From silverdoctors

Propaganda on NSA Spying & Snowden Not Working

From TheYoungTurks

US slams Russia for giving 'propaganda platform' to Snowden

From RussiaToday

From PressTVGlobalNews

Crashes of Convenience: Michael Hastings

From corbettreport