From ZeroHedge.com
Original Source
A month ago we warned that JPM's CIO office is nothing short of the world's largest prop trading desk.
Not only were we right, but what just transpired is just shy of our
worst possible prediction. At the end of the day, the real question is
why did JPM put in so much money at risk in a prop trade because we can
dispense with the bullshit that his was a hedge, right? Simple: because
it knew with 100% certainty that if things turn out very, very badly,
that the taxpayer, via the Fed, would come to its rescue. Luckily,
things turned out only 80% bad. Although it is not over yet: if credit
spreads soar, assuming at $200 million DV01, and a 100 bps move, JPM
could suffer a $20 billion loss when all is said and done. But hey: at
least "net" is not "gross" and we know, just know, that the SEC will get
involved and make sure something like this never happens again.
As for what we said before, we will just repost the whole thing as we were, once again, right.
From April13: Why JPM's "Chief Investment Office" Is The World's Largest Prop Trading Desk: Fact And Fiction
For the fiction, we go to JPM's conference call transcript where we had the following disclosures.
Read more
As for what we said before, we will just repost the whole thing as we were, once again, right.
From April13: Why JPM's "Chief Investment Office" Is The World's Largest Prop Trading Desk: Fact And Fiction
For the fiction, we go to JPM's conference call transcript where we had the following disclosures.
- "I did want to talk about the topics in the news around CIO and just take a step back and remind our investors about that activity and performance. We have more liabilities, $1.1 trillion of deposits than we have loans, approximately $720 billion. And we take that differential and we invest it, and that portfolio today is approximately $360 billion. We invest those dollars in high grade, low-risk securities. We have got about $175 billion worth of mortgage securities, we have got government agency securities, high-grade credit and covered bonds, securitized products, municipals, marketable CDs. The vast majority of those are government or government-backed and very high grade in nature. We invest those in order to hedge the interest rate risk of the firm as a function of that liability and asset mismatch."
- "We hedge basis risk, we hedge convexity risk, foreign exchange risk is managed through CIO, and MSR risk. We also do it to generate NII, which we do with that portfolio. The result of all of that is we also need to manage the stress loss associated with that portfolio, and so we have put on positions to manage for a significant stress event in Credit. We have had that position on for many years and the activities that have been reported in the paper are basically part of managing that stress loss position, which we moderate and change over time depending upon our views as to what the risks are for stress loss from credit. And I would add that all those positions are fully transparent to the regulators. They review them, have access to them at any point in time, get the information on those positions on a regular and recurring basis as part of our normalized reporting. All of those positions are put on pursuant to the risk management at the firm-wide level. They are done to keep the Company effectively balanced from a risk standpoint.... " Of course, when you own the regulators, it is not much of an issue... And would it be the same regulators who we have now confirmed don't understand the first thing about markets?
- "All of those decisions are made on a very long-term basis." Indeed - and the Norway sovereign wealth fund bought Greek bonds investing in "eternity." Only problem is eternity came far faster than expected."
- "The last comment that I would make is that based on, we believe, the spirit of the legislation as well as our reading of the legislation and consistent with this long-term investment philosophy we have in CIO we believe all of this is consistent with what we believe the ultimate outcome will be related to Volcker."
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment